Ford v Ferrari (2019)

Brief Intro

“Ford v Ferrari,” directed by James Mangold, is a high-octane drama based on the true story of the rivalry between Ford Motor Company and Ferrari in the 1960s. The film follows visionary car designer Carroll Shelby and fearless driver Ken Miles as they build a revolutionary race car for Ford to challenge Ferrari at the 24 Hours of Le Mans.

Literary Devices Used in Ford v Ferrari

Metaphor

Movie SceneDevice Example
Shelby explaining the “perfect lap” to MilesThe “perfect lap” as a metaphor for perfection and mastery.
Ford executives discussing the race as warThe competition described as a battlefield.

Foreshadowing

Movie SceneDevice Example
Shelby’s initial meeting with Henry Ford IIHints of future conflicts and challenges.
Ken Miles arguing about car adjustmentsEarly signs of Miles’ tragic fate.

Irony

Movie SceneDevice Example
Ford’s marketing team celebrating prematurelyDramatic irony as the audience knows the race isn’t won yet.
Ferrari’s dismissive attitude towards FordSituational irony when Ford beats Ferrari.

Symbolism

Movie SceneDevice Example
The Ford GT40 car itselfRepresents innovation and American ingenuity.
Le Mans trackSymbolizes the ultimate test of endurance and skill.

Hyperbole

Movie SceneDevice Example
Shelby describing the speed of the carExaggerated descriptions to emphasize performance.
Ford executives’ expectations of the raceOver-the-top expectations to show high stakes.

Flashback

Movie SceneDevice Example
Shelby recalling his racing daysProvides background on his expertise and passion.
Miles reminiscing about his early racing careerGives depth to his character and motivations.

Allusion

Movie SceneDevice Example
References to Enzo Ferrari’s legacyAlludes to the grandeur of Ferrari’s racing history.
Mentions of World War II in Ford’s strategyAlludes to Ford’s manufacturing role during the war.

Personification

Movie SceneDevice Example
Shelby talking about the car as a living entityGives the car human-like qualities.
Engineers referring to the engine’s “heart”Personifies parts of the car to create emotional attachment.

Dialogue

Movie SceneDevice Example
Conversations between Shelby and MilesReveals their personalities and dynamic.
Boardroom discussions at FordHighlights corporate culture and tensions.

Juxtaposition

Movie SceneDevice Example
American vs. Italian car cultureContrasts different approaches to car racing.
Miles’ home life vs. racing lifeHighlights the stark differences in his worlds.

Character Analysis Through Literary Devices

Carroll Shelby

DeviceExplanation
MetaphorShelby’s comparisons of racing to art reveal his passion for perfection.
DialogueHis conversations show his strategic thinking and persuasive skills.

Ken Miles

DeviceExplanation
FlashbackProvides insight into his motivations and racing background.
SymbolismHis dedication to the GT40 symbolizes his commitment to excellence.

Henry Ford II

DeviceExplanation
IronyHis overconfidence contrasted with actual race outcomes.
DialogueDisplays his authoritative and ambitious nature.

Enzo Ferrari

DeviceExplanation
AllusionReferences to his legacy emphasize his stature in the racing world.
JuxtapositionContrasts his traditional approach with Ford’s innovative strategies.

Character Dynamics

The relationship between Shelby and Miles is pivotal, driven by mutual respect and a shared passion for racing. Their dynamic propels the narrative, showcasing themes of friendship, trust, and determination. Shelby’s strategic mind complements Miles’ driving prowess, creating a powerful synergy that challenges Ford’s corporate rigidity and Ferrari’s racing dominance.

Thematic Analysis

Ambition and Innovation

DeviceExplanation
MetaphorThe race as a metaphor for personal and corporate ambition.
JuxtapositionContrasts Ford’s innovative approach with Ferrari’s traditionalism.

Friendship and Loyalty

DeviceExplanation
DialogueConversations between Shelby and Miles highlight their bond.
SymbolismThe GT40 car as a symbol of their collaborative effort.

Corporate Politics

DeviceExplanation
IronyFord’s executives’ decisions often backfire, highlighting the absurdity of corporate politics.
FlashbackHistorical references to Ford’s past achievements set the stage for current challenges.

Cinematic Techniques That Enhance Literary Devices

Literary DeviceTechniqueExplanation
MetaphorVisual MetaphorsUse of visual elements to represent concepts, like the GT40 symbolizing innovation.
ForeshadowingLighting and ShadowsDramatic lighting to hint at future events or outcomes.
IronySound DesignContrasting cheerful music with tense or disappointing scenes.
SymbolismColor SchemesUse of color to signify different themes or character traits.
DialogueClose-upsIntimate shots during key conversations to emphasize importance.

Key Scene Analysis

Scene 1: Shelby’s Pitch to Ford Executives

Link: Shelby’s Pitch

Breakdown: This scene uses sharp dialogue and close-up shots to convey Shelby’s persuasive skills and Ford’s skepticism. The interplay between characters sets the stage for the film’s central conflict.

Scene 2: Ken Miles’ First Test Drive

Link: Miles’ Test Drive

Breakdown: The scene uses dynamic camera angles and sound design to highlight Miles’ driving expertise and the car’s power. The juxtaposition of serene moments with high-speed action underscores Miles’ control and focus.

Scene 3: The Le Mans Race Climax

Link: Le Mans Race

Breakdown: This climactic scene employs a combination of slow-motion shots, intense music, and close-ups to heighten the drama. The use of irony and foreshadowing is evident as the race unfolds, revealing character arcs and themes.

Conclusion

Interactive Quiz

Question 1: Which literary device is used when Shelby describes the “perfect lap”?

Question 2: How does the film use juxtaposition in its thematic exploration?

  • A) By contrasting different approaches to car racing.
  • B) By using exaggerated descriptions.
  • C) By highlighting Shelby’s past racing career.

Question 3: What does the GT40 symbolize in the film?

  • A) Failure
  • B) Innovation
  • C) Friendship

Question 4: Which technique is used to enhance the metaphor of the race?

  • A) Lighting and Shadows
  • B) Visual Metaphors
  • C) Color Schemes

Question 5: What literary device is prominently featured in the Le Mans race climax?

Index